1971 Coca Cola Ad: “I’d like to teach the world to sing” I still get emotional when I think of it.

January 13, 2024 (updated November 4, 2024)

The 1971 Coca-Cola “Hilltop” ad, often referred to the “I’d Like to Buy the World a Coke,” ad stands as an enormous moment in the history of advertising but also in our psyche as young baby boomers. It left a lasting impact on both popular culture and the soft drink industry. I can still hear in my head “I’d like to teach the world to sing and bring it harmony…” This commercial, created by the McCann Erickson advertising agency, was part of Coca-Cola’s “It’s the Real Thing” campaign and aimed to promote unity, peace, and harmony in a world that, in the early 1970s was grappling with tremendous social and political unrest – such as the Vietnam war.

At the heart of the ad is a catchy jingle with lyrics that convey a simple yet powerful message of global togetherness. The commercial features a diverse group of young people from around the world, standing on a hillside, singing the jingle together. The lyrics express a desire for harmony, understanding, and a shared Coca-Cola. The image of people from different backgrounds coming together to enjoy a simple pleasure like a soft drink and to express a desire for harmony and peace struck a chord with people here in the US but also worldwide.

One of the immediate impacts of the ad was its cultural resonance. The 1971 Coca-Cola commercial reflected the feeling of the time, capturing the spirit of the counterculture movement and, in the days just following the 1969 Woodstock “Peace and Love” concert, the longing by all of us who lived through that time, for a more peaceful and harmonious world. The ad resonated with us, a generation that was questioning established norms and advocating for peace amid the turbulent backdrop of the Vietnam War and social upheaval.

In terms of marketing strategy, the 1971 Coca-Cola ad was groundbreaking. It demonstrated the power of emotional marketing and storytelling, setting a precedent for future advertising campaigns. By associating the brand with positive emotions and universal themes, Coca-Cola managed to create a lasting connection with consumers. The ad’s success also paved the way for other brands to explore socially conscious and emotionally resonant marketing approaches.

In conclusion, the 1971 Coca-Cola Hilltop ad left an indelible mark on advertising history. Its cultural impact, contribution to Coca-Cola’s brand image, and influence on marketing strategies are evident even decades later. The ad demonstrated the power of a simple message – one that transcends borders, cultures, and languages. It not only sold a beverage but also sold an idea of a better, more harmonious world, making it a timeless and iconic piece of advertising.

The Beatles

The Breakup of The Beatles

January 9, 2024 (updated January 9, 2024)

Introduction:

The breakup of The Beatles in 1970 marked the end of an era for one of the most influential bands in the history of popular music. Comprising John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr, The Beatles had captivated the world with their amazing sound, charismatic personalities, and unprecedented success. However, behind the scenes, tensions were brewing, leading to a dissolution that shook the music industry and left fans mourning the end of an extraordinary era.

What happened? Rifts within the Band:

The Beatles’ breakup was not a sudden event but rather a culmination of longstanding tensions within the band. Creative differences between Lennon and McCartney, the primary songwriting duo, had been simmering for years. As the band’s sound evolved, so did the individual musical aspirations of its members. The contrasting visions for the direction of their music, coupled with personal differences, began to strain the once-tight-knit bond.

The Death of Brian Epstein:

The untimely death of their manager, Brian Epstein, in 1967, dealt a severe blow to the band’s stability. Epstein had played a crucial role in shaping The Beatles’ image and managing their affairs. His absence left a void in the band’s structure, exposing them to the harsh realities of the music industry without Brian’s guiding hand. The lack of a central figure to mediate conflicts and manage the business side of the band added fuel to the growing internal tensions.

Yoko Ono’s Influence:

The entry of Yoko Ono, John Lennon’s second wife, into the Beatles’ inner circle also contributed to the strains. Ono’s presence during recording sessions and her active involvement in Lennon’s creative process created discomfort among the other band members. The dynamic that had once thrived on collaboration began to fracture as individual relationships took precedence over the collective vision of the group.

Get Back Sessions and Let It Be:

The band’s final studio album, “Let It Be,” and the accompanying documentary of the “Get Back” sessions shed light on the internal struggles within the group. The recordings captured moments of frustration, disagreement, and a sense of detachment that underscored the disintegration of the once-unbreakable camaraderie. The album’s title track, “Let It Be,” conveyed a poignant message, almost serving as an unintentional farewell anthem. It was almost as if the band was telling us to be ok with their break up and to just let their break up to be what it is and just “Let it be.”

Legal Battles and Business Disputes:

Amidst the emotional turmoil, legal battles and business disputes further strained the band’s unity. The formation of Apple Corps, the band’s multimedia corporation, faced financial troubles and mismanagement. Disagreements over financial matters and the direction of the company added another layer of difficulty to the already fragile and fraying relationships between the band members.

The Bitter End:

On April 10, 1970, Paul McCartney officially announced the breakup of The Beatles through a press release accompanying his solo album, “McCartney.” The news sent shockwaves through the music world, leaving fans in disbelief. The era of The Beatles had come to an end, and each member embarked on their solo careers, marking a new chapter in their musical journeys.

Conclusion:

The breakup of The Beatles remains a bittersweet chapter in the history of music. While the band’s legacy endures through their timeless catalog, the dissolution serves as a reminder of the complex dynamics that exist within creative partnerships. The Beatles’ breakup was a result of a combination of creative, personal, and business factors that, when woven together, unraveled the fabric of a band that had once defined an era. Though their time together was relatively short, the impact of The Beatles on music and popular culture continues to reverberate, transcending the confines of their tumultuous end.

Nixon's resignation

1974: President Nixon’s resignation

December 19, 2023 (updated December 19, 2023)

August 8, 1974, marked a momentous day in American history. That was the day that President Richard Nixon, the 37th President of the United States, resigned from office. It was an unbelievable day. It was the year that I graduated from high school. I was just a kid and I did not realize what a momentous day this was. This unprecedented event, fueled by the Watergate scandal, unfolded against the backdrop of a nation deeply divided and disillusioned by political misconduct. The resignation of Nixon had far-reaching implications, reshaping the political landscape and leaving an indelible mark on the collective consciousness of the American people.

The Watergate scandal, which ultimately led to Nixon’s resignation, began with a break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters on June 17, 1972. As investigations progressed, it became evident that the Nixon administration had orchestrated a web of deceit and cover-ups to conceal its involvement in the break-in. The discovery of secret White House tapes, capturing incriminating conversations, served as a smoking gun, revealing the extent of Nixon’s complicity.

The nation had become accustomed to political scandals, but the Watergate affair was unbelievable in its scale and impact. The erosion of public trust in the highest levels of government was palpable, and the unfolding revelations shocked the American people. As the investigation intensified, impeachment absolutely loomed over Nixon’s presidency, prompting a deepening sense of crisis.

Amid mounting pressure and the imminent threat of impeachment, president Richard Nixon chose to address the nation on the evening of August 8, 1974. In a televised speech from the Oval Office, he announced his decision to resign, becoming the first (and only) president in American history to do so. The gravity of the moment was reflected in Nixon’s somber and reflective tone as he acknowledged the toll the scandal had taken on the nation and his ability to lead. In this famous helicopter parting picture, Nixon tried to put a happy face on what absolutely was a devastating moment for him (see below).

Nixon’s resignation speech was a poignant mix of remorse and defiance. He admitted to mistakes but insisted that he had never been a quitter. The emotional weight of the moment was evident as he bid farewell to the presidency, a position he had held for more than five years. The speech concluded with Nixon boarding a helicopter on the White House lawn, a symbolic departure from the seat of power he could no longer retain.

The aftermath of Nixon’s resignation ushered in an era of reflection and reform in American politics. Gerald Ford, Nixon’s vice president, assumed the presidency, declaring that “our long national nightmare is over.” Ford’s pardon of Nixon a month later, while aimed at promoting healing, proved controversial and fueled public skepticism. The scars of Watergate lingered, leaving an enduring legacy of skepticism toward political leadership and institutions.

The day of Nixon’s resignation marked a turning point in the American political landscape. It underscored the resilience of democratic institutions in the face of crisis, as the nation weathered a severe test of its democratic principles. The Watergate scandal prompted reforms aimed at increasing transparency and accountability in government, with the hope of preventing such abuses of power in the future.

In retrospect, August 8, 1974, remains etched in the collective memory of the American people as a day of reckoning and renewal. The resignation of Richard Nixon demonstrated the capacity of the nation to confront and rectify political wrongdoing, reinforcing the notion that no one, not even the president, is above the law. As America moved forward, the lessons of Watergate became integral to the nation’s commitment to preserving the integrity of its democratic institutions.

1971 ban on TV Cigarette Ads

December 17, 2023 (updated December 17, 2023)

Introduction:

1971 marked a big moment in the history of public health and the media. This is the year when the United States’ government imposed a ban on television cigarette advertisements. This landmark decision was driven by a growing awareness of the terrible health effects of smoking and a recognition of the influential role that mass media plays in shaping public opinion and behavior. The ban on TV cigarette advertisements not only reflected a shift in societal attitudes toward tobacco consumption but also set a precedent for the regulation of harmful products in the media.

Background:

In the mid -1900s, smoking was deeply ingrained in American culture. Cigarette companies were major advertisers and their commercials were everywhere on TV. However, as scientific evidence linking smoking to lung cancer and other important health issues became more robust, public awareness of the dangers of smoking increased. The Surgeon General’s Report on Smoking and Health in 1964 served as a huge moment, officially acknowledging the health risks associated with tobacco use and prompting a reevaluation of societal norms. Gone were the days of Humphrey Bogart looking awfully cool with a cigarette in his hand.

The Ban:

In response to the mounting evidence against smoking, Congress passed the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act in 1969. This legislation mandated health warnings on cigarette packages and advertisements, acknowledging the need for informed consumer choices. However, the most impactful provision was yet to come. In 1971, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) implemented a complete ban on cigarette advertising on television and radio, effective from January 2, 1971.

Rationale:

The decision to ban TV cigarette advertisements was rooted in the understanding that mass media has a profound influence on public perception and behavior. By removing tobacco commercials from the airwaves, the government sought to diminish the glamorization of smoking and reduce its social acceptability. The ban aimed to protect the public, especially the youth, from the seductive allure of cigarette advertising and its potential to normalize a habit that posed severe health risks.

Impact:

The immediate impact of the ban was evident in the decline of smoking rates. Without the powerful tool of television advertising, tobacco companies found it challenging to maintain their previous levels of influence. Moreover, the ban shifted societal norms, casting smoking in a less favorable light. As a result, smoking rates began a gradual decline that continued over the following decades.

Legacy:

The ban on TV cigarette advertisements left a lasting legacy, demonstrating the government’s commitment to prioritizing public health over commercial interests. It set a precedent for regulating the advertising of products deemed harmful to public well-being. This approach has since been extended to other substances, such as alcohol and prescription medications (although you wouldn’t know it judging from the many ads we see on TV today for prescription-only medications), illustrating the enduring impact of the 1971 decision on media regulation.

Conclusion:

The 1971 ban on TV cigarette advertisements was a key moment that showcased the government’s recognition of its role in safeguarding public health. By severing the powerful connection between tobacco companies and the mass media, the ban marked a turning point in the fight against smoking-related illnesses. Beyond its immediate impact on smoking rates, the decision laid the groundwork for future regulations on advertising harmful products, emphasizing the importance of balancing commercial interests with the well-being of the public.

The Graduate: 56 years ago? Really?

December 14, 2023 (updated December 14, 2023)

The Graduate is one of those films that touched our lives as young people and immediately entered into our collective memories and into our collective psyches. I was 13 years old on December 22, 1967 when this film was released and I will never forget how I felt when I saw this movie. I had a huge crush at the time on my “super old” 30 – something (heaven forbid 40?) year- old school teacher and this movie made me feel both good and badly at the same time. I wonder how many of us Baby Boomers remember this movie and how it made us feel when it was released 56 years ago. How we felt (and feel?) every time that we hear Simon and Garfunkel’s song “Mrs. Robinson.” Can that possibly be? Can it be that this movie of our childhoods was released 56 YEARS AGO??!

For those of us who may not fully remember (and for the rare few of us who did not see the movie) here is the plot of the movie (as best I could gather from Wikipedia). Our hero, Ben Braddock has recently graduated from a small Eastern college and has returned home to a suburb of Los Angeles. Benjamin, visibly uncomfortable as his parents deliver accolades and neighborhood friends ask him about his future plans, evades those who try to congratulate him. Mrs. Robinson enters his room, asking him strange questions and probing into his life. After he drives her home, Mrs. Robinson attempts to seduce him. Benjamin rebuffs her and quickly goes downstairs as he hears Mr. Robinson arriving home.

A week after his 21st birthday, Benjamin begins his affair with Mrs. Robinson and meets her at the Taft Hotel. In mid-September, Benjamin spends the time drifting around in the pool by day, purposefully neglecting to select a graduate school, and seeing Mrs. Robinson at the hotel by night. One evening, Mrs. Robinson reveals that she is in a loveless marriage, because in the 1940s, she became pregnant with her daughter, Elaine, dropped out of college, and married to avoid scandal.

After being increasingly pressured by his parents and Mr. Robinson to go on a date with Elaine, he takes her out but deliberately sabotages the date by driving recklessly and taking her to two clubs and a strip show. Benjamin discovers that he likes Elaine and decides to tell her everything. Elaine is furious and returns to Berkley where she is a student at the university.

Several months later, Benjamin goes to Berkeley and moves into a rooming house near Elaine’s dormitory. Elaine is uneasy in his presence and tells him that she has started dating Carl Smith, a medical student. Elaine accuses him of taking advantage of her mother’s drunken state and raping her, refusing to believe that it was her mother who initiated the affair. Elaine eventually realizes that her mother was lying, and makes Benjamin promise to not leave Berkeley until he has definite plans.

When Benjamin proposes marriage, Elaine says she is concerned about graduating from college and her relationship with her parents if she continues to see him. Benjamin receives a telegram from Mrs. Robinson, telling him to get out of town immediately. Mr. Robinson arrives at the college and tells Benjamin that he is divorcing his wife and terminating his partnership with Mr. Braddock. Robinson forces his daughter to drop out of school and takes her away, warning Benjamin against further contact. Benjamin returns to his hometown and sneaks into the Robinsons’ home but encounters both Mr. and Mrs. Robinson, who call the police and claim that a man has broken into their house. He escapes from the house and returns to Berkeley to find Elaine.

In San Francisco, he learns that Carl will marry Elaine that very morning. Benjamin takes a plane to Santa Barbara, finds the church, and interrupts the ceremony. He runs downstairs to the sanctuary, punches Mr. Robinson, and fights Carl off using a cross as a weapon. Together, Benjamin and Elaine flee the church and ride off on the nearest bus to elope. I don’t know about you, but remembering this film and how it made me feel is one of the cherished memories of my youth. Enjoy. PhotoMem.

1971 Ford Pinto: Lessons learned

December 13, 2023 (updated April 13, 2024)

Introduction:

The Ford Pinto, introduced in 1971, was a subcompact car that gained infamy due to a series of safety-related problems, most notably its susceptibility to fires in rear-end collisions. This essay explores the key issues surrounding the Ford Pinto, examining the ethical considerations and corporate decisions that contributed to one of the darkest chapters in automotive history.

Engineering Flaws and Safety Concerns:

One of the primary issues with the Ford Pinto was its flawed design, particularly in the placement of the fuel tank. Positioned in a vulnerable location just behind the rear axle, the fuel tank was highly susceptible to rupturing in the event of a rear-end collision. This design flaw significantly increased the risk of post-collision fires, putting both the driver and passengers at grave danger.

It is amazing when we think of this today. The Ford Pinto was a bad experience in our history of automobile making

Corporate Decision-Making:

One of the most controversial aspects of the Ford Pinto case was the internal cost-benefit analysis conducted by Ford. In documents later revealed during lawsuits, it became clear that Ford had knowledge of the potential dangers posed by the Pinto’s design. However, a cost-benefit analysis performed by the company concluded that the cost of fixing the safety issues outweighed the potential liabilities from injuries or fatalities resulting from accidents.

This decision to prioritize financial considerations over consumer safety raised serious ethical questions about corporate responsibility. Critics argue that Ford’s actions demonstrated a callous disregard for human life, as the company knowingly continued to produce and sell a car with known safety defects.

Legal and Regulatory Consequences:

The Ford Pinto controversy eventually landed in courtrooms, leading to lawsuits and legal repercussions for the automaker. In one infamous case, Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Company, a jury awarded damages to a plaintiff who suffered severe burns in a Pinto-related accident. The legal battles exposed internal memos and documents, providing a damning narrative of Ford’s knowledge and decision-making process.

The fallout from the Ford Pinto case also prompted regulatory changes in the automotive industry. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) established stricter safety standards and regulations, emphasizing the need for manufacturers to prioritize safety in their designs. The Pinto experience served as a cautionary tale, prompting both the public and regulatory bodies to scrutinize corporate practices more closely.

Legacy and Lessons Learned:

The Ford Pinto case remains a poignant example of the ethical challenges faced by corporations when balancing financial interests against consumer safety. It highlights the importance of transparency, accountability, and prioritizing the well-being of customers. The fallout from the Pinto incident contributed to a shift in public perception, with consumers becoming more conscious of the safety features and practices employed by automakers.

The Pinto experience also underscored the significance of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Companies are increasingly expected to act ethically and prioritize the safety and well-being of their customers. The Ford Pinto case serves as a stark reminder that the pursuit of profit should never come at the expense of human lives and safety.

Conclusion:

The Ford Pinto problems represent a dark chapter in the history of the automotive industry, marked by ethical lapses and corporate decisions that prioritized financial considerations over consumer safety. The legacy of the Pinto case extends beyond the courtroom, influencing changes in regulations and emphasizing the importance of ethical decision-making in corporate culture. As we reflect on this episode, it serves as a reminder of the responsibilities that corporations bear toward their customers and society at large.

Our youth: Should we just let it be?

December 12, 2023 (updated December 12, 2023)

The release of the “Let It Be” album by The Beatles in May 1970 marked the end of an era and the beginning of a new chapter in the history of popular music. This album, which was initially intended to be the soundtrack for a documentary film of the same name, holds a special place in the hearts of fans and critics alike. Its significance goes beyond its musical content, encompassing the cultural, historical, and emotional aspects of the time.

Just as they were getting ready to break up: One of the key elements that make “Let It Be” so significant is its timing. The album was released at a crucial juncture in the Beatles’ career. The band had already announced its breakup, and internal tensions were palpable during the recording sessions. Despite the challenges, the album managed to capture the essence of the Beatles’ musical journey. It offered a poignant farewell, showcasing the band’s versatility and evolution over the years.

The title track, “Let It Be,” became an anthem of acceptance and resilience. Its lyrics, penned by Paul McCartney, resonated with a sense of hope and a message to find peace in difficult times. The song’s timeless quality has made it a source of comfort for listeners facing their own struggles, contributing to the enduring legacy of the album.

The “Let It Be” album also played a crucial role in shaping the perception of the Beatles as individuals and as a collective. The accompanying documentary, directed by Michael Lindsay-Hogg, provided a candid look into the dynamics of the band during their final days together. While it showcased moments of tension and disagreement, it also revealed the enduring camaraderie and musical brilliance that defined the Beatles. This raw and unfiltered portrayal added depth to the public’s understanding of the band, making the album a documentation of the end of an era.

Musically, “Let It Be” showcased the Beatles’ ability to seamlessly blend various genres and styles. From the soulful balladry of “Let It Be” to the rock-infused energy of “Get Back” and the bluesy undertones of “I’ve Got a Feeling,” the album demonstrated the band’s versatility. The inclusion of live recordings from the famous rooftop concert in London further emphasized the Beatles’ prowess as a live performance act.

The launch of the “Let It Be” album also marked the end of an era for the music industry itself. The 1970s saw a shift in musical trends, with the rise of new genres and the emergence of solo artists. The Beatles, having shaped the landscape of popular music throughout the 1960s, closed the chapter on their collective journey with “Let It Be.” The album’s release, therefore, symbolized the conclusion of a remarkable decade and the beginning of a new era in music.

In conclusion, the launch of the “Let It Be” album holds immense significance in the history of music. It serves as a farewell from one of the greatest bands of all time, offering a poignant reflection on their journey and legacy. Beyond its musical brilliance, the album encapsulates the emotions, tensions, and camaraderie that defined the Beatles. As fans continue to revisit “Let It Be,” its enduring impact on popular culture remains a testament to the timelessness of the Beatles’ music and the indelible mark they left on the world.

Thalidomide: Our 1960s nightmare

December 10, 2023 (updated December 10, 2023)

The beginning of the nightmare

A late 1950s advertisement touted a new drug called “Mornidine” (which was another name for Thalidomide). The advertisement said that “Mornidine is a drug with specific effectiveness for treating the nausea and vomiting which occurs in early pregnancy.” Can you imagine? It SPECIFICALLY said to use this drug “In Pregnancy.” It would turn out, as we will see below, that using this drug during pregnancy produced disastrous results!

The late 1950s and early 1960s were the beginning of the nightmare. Mornidine was, in actuality a drug called Thalidomde which had been developed in the mid 1950s by the West German pharmaceutical company Chemie Grünenthal GmbH. It was originally intended as a sedative or tranquilizer but was soon used for treating a wide range of other conditions, including colds, flu, nausea and – worst of all – morning sickness in pregnant women.

A prescription was never required.

Really? How could it be that a doctor’s prescription was never required for people to have access to Thalidomide? Well actually yes. It is unfortunately true. When initially released in Germany in late 1950s, a prescription was not required for people to have access to Thalidomide. Why? Well, it so happened that during early testing of Thalidomide, researchers found that “it was virtually impossible to give test animals a lethal dose of this drug”. What that meant is the they gave Thalidomide to laboratory test animals and that (pretty much) no matter how high a dose of Thalidomide they gave to laboratory test animals, it did not kill them. Therefore, based on this, the drug was felt to be harmless to give to humans. As a result, Thalidomide was licensed in Germany in July 1956 for over-the-counter sale (no doctor’s prescription was needed). Unbelievable but unfortunately true.

By 1958, Thalidomide was being produced and sold in various countries. In the United Kingdom it was produced and sold under various brand names, such as Distaval, Tensival, Valgraine and Asmaval. That means that in 1958 in Great Britain, you could walk up to your local pharmacy and pick up some Thalidomide without a prescription (under the various brand names mentioned above) to treat the nausea, or “Morning Sickness”, which is often encountered in early pregnancy. Advertisements of the time said things like “Distaval (another name for Thalidomide) can be given with complete safety to pregnant women (!) and nursing mothers without adverse effect to mother or child.” Nothing could be further from the truth.

In the USA: Dr. Kelsey saved us!

Here in the USA, we were largely saved this Thalidomide nightmare by a physician/pharmacist at the FDA by the name of Frances Oldham Kelsey, MD, PhD (or “Frankie” as her friends called her). Despite tremendous pressure from the pharmaceutical company that wanted the FDA to approve Thalidomide for use in the USA, Dr. Kelsey stubbornly turned down their many requests for the FDA to approve Thalidomide to be put pharmacy store shelves here in the USA. Dr. Kelsey felt that the companies had not provided enough clinical evidence to refute reports coming to the US from England (and other countries) of adults who developed nerve damage in their limbs after long-term use of Thalidomide. Unbelievably this was Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey’s only her second case on the job as one of the reviewers for NDAs (New Drug Application) for the FDA. Dr. Kelsey, who passed away on August 7, 2015 at the age of 101, was a rookie at the FDA when a pharmaceutical company applied to the FDA to approve Thalidomide for us in the USA and rookie or not, she largely saved the US (the country as a whole) from the terrible nightmare of what was Thalidomide in the early 1960s! This took tremendous courage on her part.

On September 8, 1960, Dr. Kelsey received an NDA (New Drug Application) from a pharmaceutical company headquartered in Cincinnati called the “Richardson-Merrell” Company” who wanted the FDA to approve for the USA their new sedative which they called “Kevadon”, (but in reality this was Thalidomide under a US tradename). What is even more significant of the courage and sacrifice that Dr. Oldham Kelsey did for all of us is that at the time, a New Drug Application (NDA), by rule, had to be processed within 60 days or the company had the automatic right to market the product in the US! Can you imagine? What if Dr. Kelsey did not defend us as stubbornly as she did? In addition, unbelievable but true, at the time in the late 50s and early 60s, whether or not it was yet approved by the FDA, drug companies were permitted to freely distribute products to doctors if the packaging was labeled “experimental.” These reasons are why, despite Dr. Kelsey’s unbelievably heroic efforts, here in the US we still had a number of children born with birth defects due to Thalidomide.

The pressure on Dr. Kelsey was tremendous

The pharmaceutical company, Richardson-Merrell, expected to officially launch their Thalidomide medication onto US store shelves within 6 months of when they applied to the FDA for approval. They thought that they would have this medication on store shelves by March 6, 1961! In fact, they had already started to freely distribute samples of this Thalidomide formulation here in the USA and they were telling doctors and patients that their new sedative which they called Kevadon, (but in reality, this was Thalidomide under a US tradename) was supposedly “extremely safe, even for children” and – said even worse – that it was supposedly “safe and effective against the morning sickness of pregnancy”! (which it most definitely was NOT safe!).

Kelsey and her team repeatedly rejected the application for FDA approval for Thalidomide by the Richardson-Merrell Company, thereby angering the company tremendously. Richardson-Merrell submitted to the FDA and to Dr. Kelsey so-called “additional data” to try to compel the FDA to approve Thalidomide for over-the-counter use in the USA, but again Dr. Kelsey and her team rejected Richardson-Merrell’s application noting that their application was, again “incomplete and inadequate”. As expected, the Richardson-Merrell Company became very angry with Dr. Kelsey’s repeated rejections of Thalidomide for US store shelves. In about 18 months, unbelievably, they made approximately 50 visits to Dr. Kelsey’s office trying to get her to approve Thalidomide for the US store shelves – to give to pregnant women for “morning sickness”! Can you imagine the disaster if Dr. Kelsey would have buckled under this pressure and would have approved Thalidomide for US store shelves?

During the time when Dr. Kelsey was rejecting the repeated applications by the Richardson-Merrell Company to approve Thalidomide for United State store shelves, the US started to receive reports from doctors in the UK, Australia, Europe, Japan and West Germany, noting an alarming rate of malformed babies from mothers who were taking Thalidomide when they were pregnant (remember, there was no Internet in those days so these reports had to wait for regular mail). These reports noted that women who were taking Thalidomide during pregnancy were either miscarrying their pregnancies or their babies were being born without arms, without legs, sometimes without eyes and with many other horrible deformities. Other countries therefore began pulling Thalidomide from their markets and, after learning of all of these serious side effects in other countries, on March 8, 1962 the Richardson-Merrell company withdrew from the FDA their application for the approval of their formulation of Thalidomide for the USA!. Dr. Kelsey’s refusal to approve thalidomide for sale in the US prevented the births of thousands of seriously malformed babies.

By the time that it was all said and done, by late 50s and early 60s more than 10,000 children in 46 countries were born with deformities as a consequence of their mothers taking thalidomide during their pregnancies. It was determined that the severity, and even the location of the birth defects, depended on how many days into the pregnancy the mom took Thalidomide:

20 days: If the mom took Thalidomide on or before the 20th day of pregnancy, it caused brain damage in the newborn.

21 days: If the mom took Thalidomide around the 21st day of pregnancy, it caused damage the eyes, the ears and face of the newborn. Some newborns were even born without eyes!

24 through 28 days: If the mom took Thalidomide from the 24th through the 28th day of pregnancy, Thalidomide caused damage to the arms and legs of the newborn. Some newborns were born without arms or legs!

In August 1962, President John F. Kennedy awarded Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey the President’s Medal for Distinguished Federal Civilian Service for her exceptional judgment in evaluating the drug Thalidomide and rejecting it for US store shelves. Dr. Kelsey was only the second woman ever to receive this award—the highest honor that can be bestowed upon a US civilian. As noted above, sadly Dr. Kelsey passed away on August 7, 2015 at the age of 101, We owe her so much. It is like what Winston Churchill said of the pilots who defended Britain from the Nazi onslaught during the Battle of Britain. “Never have so many, owed so much, to so few!”

Day the music died

When the music died in the 70s: Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, and Jimi Hendrix

December 10, 2023 (updated December 10, 2023)

Introduction:

The late 1960s and early 1970s marked a huge era in our world of rock music, characterized by a cultural revolution, huge political upheavals, and unbelievable creative explosions. This transformative period witnessed the rise of three figures whose impact on the music scene was both profound and enduring – Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, and Jimi Hendrix. Their careers soared like meteoric comets, forever leaving a mark on the history of rock and roll. However, fate dealt a cruel hand, and within a span of just two years, the world lost these iconic musicians in a tragic sequence of events. Can you imagine? At the prime of their lives, all three were gone in less than two years. The late 50s and early 60s also had their “day when the music died” when on February 3, 1959, Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valens, “The Big Bopper” J. P. Richardson, and pilot Roger Peterson were killed in a plane crash near Clear Lake, Iowa.

The Rise to Stardom:

Janis Joplin, with her raw and emotive voice, shattered conventions and became the queen of blues-infused rock. Jim Morrison, the charismatic frontman of The Doors, wove poetic narratives into psychedelic soundscapes, while Jimi Hendrix’s unparalleled virtuosity with the guitar redefined the possibilities of the instrument. Each artist brought a unique flavor to the musical landscape, capturing the zeitgeist of the counterculture movement.

The Cosmic Collision:

The convergence of their deaths between 1970 and 1971 seemed like a cosmic collision, leaving fans and the music world in shock. Janis Joplin, the first to depart, succumbed to a heroin overdose on October 4, 1970, at the age of 27. Just a few weeks earlier, on September 18, 1970, Jimi Hendrix, the maestro of the electric guitar, died in London under mysterious circumstances. The final blow came on July 3, 1971, when Jim Morrison, the enigmatic poet and lead singer of The Doors, was found dead in his bathtub in Paris. The circumstances surrounding each death fueled speculation, conspiracy theories, and a collective sense of grief.

The 27 Club:

The tragic demise of Joplin, Hendrix, and Morrison contributed to the creation of the infamous “27 Club,” a morbid association of musicians who died at the age of 27. This peculiar and unfortunate connection deepened the mystique surrounding their deaths, as years later other influential artists like Kurt Cobain and Amy Winehouse also joined their ranks.

Legacy and Cultural Impact:

Despite their untimely departures, the legacy of Joplin, Morrison, and Hendrix endures through their groundbreaking music, influencing subsequent generations of musicians. Joplin’s soulful wails, Morrison’s poetic musings, and Hendrix’s revolutionary guitar techniques continue to inspire artists across genres. Their impact on the cultural and social landscape of the 1960s reverberates through time, reminding us of a bygone era of rebellion, experimentation, and artistic freedom.

The End of an Era:

The deaths of Joplin, Morrison, and Hendrix marked the symbolic end of the utopian ideals of the 1960s. The era of free love, peace, and psychedelic exploration gave way to a more cynical and disillusioned phase. The loss of these iconic figures left a void that would never be completely filled, underscoring the fragility of artistic brilliance in the face of personal struggles and societal pressures.

Conclusion:

Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, and Jimi Hendrix, though gone too soon, left an indomitable imprint on the history of rock music. Their deaths, occurring in close proximity, served as a poignant reminder of the fragility of artistic genius. As we reflect on their lives and the era they defined, we honor the enduring legacy of these three cosmic souls who, for a brief moment, illuminated the world with their extraordinary talents. The tragic triptych of Joplin, Morrison, and Hendrix stands as a testament to the enduring power of music and its ability to transcend time and space.

“Dark Side of the Moon”: 50 Years ago??

December 9, 2023 (updated December 9, 2023)

Introduction:

Can it possibly be that “Dark Side of the Moon” was released FIFTY YEARS AGO??

Fifty years ago, in 1973, Pink Floyd released their unbelievable album “The Dark Side of the Moon,” a musical masterpiece that transcended genres and redefined the landscape of progressive rock. This seminal work marked a turning point in the band’s career and has since become a cultural touchstone, celebrated for its innovative sound, profound lyrics, and thematic coherence. As we commemorate its golden anniversary, it’s essential to explore the enduring impact of “The Dark Side of the Moon” and its timeless relevance in the world of music.

Musical Innovation:

At its core, “The Dark Side of the Moon” is a sonic journey that blends progressive rock, psychedelic elements, and avant-garde experimentation. The album seamlessly integrates synthesizers, spoken-word samples, and unconventional time signatures, creating an immersive and otherworldly musical experience. The band, consisting of Roger Waters, David Gilmour, Richard Wright, and Nick Mason, pushed the boundaries of studio production, employing innovative techniques that were ahead of their time.

Speak to Me:

The album’s opener, “Speak to Me,” serves as a prelude to the musical odyssey that follows, introducing the listener to the thematic motifs that will weave through the entire record. The seamless transition between tracks, notably in the iconic heartbeat that bridges “Speak to Me” and “Breathe,” showcases the album’s meticulous attention to detail and contributes to its cohesive narrative.

Conceptual Depth:

What sets “The Dark Side of the Moon” apart is its thematic depth and conceptual coherence. The album explores universal themes such as time, mental illness, greed, and mortality. Lyrically, Roger Waters delves into the human experience, addressing the anxieties and challenges that define our existence. The recurring motif of a “prism” symbolizes the spectrum of human emotions and experiences, reinforcing the album’s overarching narrative.

The exploration of mental health in tracks like “Brain Damage” and “Eclipse” is particularly poignant. Waters’ introspective lyrics capture the struggles of the mind, resonating with listeners on a personal level. The album’s ability to connect with the human condition has contributed to its enduring popularity and timeless appeal.

Cultural Impact:

“The Dark Side of the Moon” wasn’t just a musical triumph; it was a cultural phenomenon. The iconic prism design, created by graphic designer Storm Thorgerson, became synonymous with the album and is instantly recognizable even today. The prism’s refraction of light symbolizes the diverse range of emotions explored throughout the record.

Moreover, the album’s success was groundbreaking for Pink Floyd and progressive rock as a whole. “The Dark Side of the Moon” became one of the best-selling albums of all time, spending a record-breaking 937 weeks on the Billboard 200 chart. Its popularity defied conventional expectations, proving that complex and introspective music could resonate with a broad audience.

Legacy and Continued Relevance:

Fifty years after its release, “The Dark Side of the Moon” remains a timeless masterpiece that continues to captivate new generations. Its influence can be heard in countless artists across various genres, from rock to electronic music. The album’s themes of existentialism and the human condition are as relevant today as they were in the 1970s, reflecting the enduring power of great art to transcend time.

In conclusion,

Pink Floyd’s “The Dark Side of the Moon” stands as a testament to the enduring power of music to transcend its time of creation. Its innovative sound, profound lyrics, and thematic depth have solidified its place in the pantheon of musical greats. As we celebrate the album’s 50th anniversary, we acknowledge its impact not just on the world of rock but on the broader cultural landscape, leaving an indelible mark on the hearts and minds of listeners worldwide.

Notifications
Terms And Conditions Privacy Policy
#funny #golden #happy #learning #love #memories #music #nature #peace #positive #quote #records

Latest Members